“We're testing you to see what you're capable of”, he says. It comes from a cubicle on the border of contempt, 5 miles outside of pity. He can’t / won’t comprehend that he has simplified the two decades of my career and struggle and effort into the final trivia question of the afternoon. I explain how I’d try and solve the puzzle he’s posed, but philosophy is often not enough for these boys-beyond-men-beyond-boys who have been weaned on tests and quizzes as measure of worth… of comparison… of success.
“You should solve this using recursion. Do you know what recursion is?” he says a little too clearly after it’s clear mere philosophy isn’t enough. I’m talking around the problem, but admitting where I’m not sure how to solve certain pieces of it. His voice has gone from cold to chilled, and I notice it wavers the more patience he loses. But saying “I don’t know” isn’t enough. He wants me to expand on my failure. He wants me to type my failure out. He’s already judge-and-juried me, but he wants to watch me crawl up the mountain so that he may properly kick me back down again. I suddenly want to be anywhere but on the phone with him.
I think about the happy hour I’m already late for. These thoughts of dark wooden tables and ice-cold Old Fashioneds are far too specific and far too not-this. My eyes scroll across what I’ve done, across stubs and fragments typed out in pseudo-code. “I’m not going to give you what you want.” I say, frankly. His silence lingers a bit, but he snaps back to duty. “Well then. I’ll submit my feedback to the team.” At that moment I realize the absurdity of this situation, that he never once asked me about my work or my ethos or my desires. While my distracted brain sorted through the stimuli, my mouth took over and muttered an obviously-defeated “Thank you for your time”.
In hindsight it was the very worst thing I could have said. Letting my voice admit defeat was somehow admitting his ruler was a fair measuring device. I played along with the game and I let him reduce me, completely. Think of the absurdity of the parallels – making a writer pen a poem in 20 minutes or less, having an HR candidate fire someone in front of you, watching the secretary file a large stack of papers before the buzzer goes off.
It isn’t really the footrace that I resist so much – it’s the assumption that I’m incapable of learning, and if I fail the Final Jeopardy question then I am entirely unsuitable. Wouldn’t you rather see my finest work? The code that I’m proud of, and fully thought through, and built with my own two hands? Why is the concept of a portfolio only relevant to visual artists? I’m not sure exactly who originally came up with this interview strategy, but it’s an ageist and unfair tradition that no one ever rails against.
Why? Because we-the-applicants need the job. We need it or else we don’t pay the rent, the bills. We’ll get in fights with our loved ones and we’ll let people down. While I’m feeling a little #firstworld about my inability to land the right job in a well-paying field - it feels that much more arbitrary that I am given a Yay or Nay having little to do with culture fit, aligned ideals, or prior prides.
If you aren’t familiar with Glassdoor and are in the tech industry, you should be. Each company profile now has a tab labeled “Interviews”, and people post the details of the interview questions they were asked. It’s grade-school cheating on an entirely new scale, it renders these alpha-tests even more irrelevant, and I’m so very tempted to post my own pains so that the next Running Man can fare far better.
But again – playing the game feels like the biggest disservice I can give myself. It’s Day 61 and I’m officially too old for this shit. I’ve got to come up with a way to bow out of these mind games with my head held high, to reject the maze and the assumptions and to stop the machine from rolling over me again (and again, again). The right kind of people would welcome bravado – I’ve used it to my advantage before, and I’ve got to find a way to stand up for myself now.


